I need some electrical charging system advice> My 1999 Lincoln seem to have a faulty or limited charging system. I just changed batteries and traded for a higher quality that the one I replaced. It seems that the battery is not receiving a full charge and the battery -after only three weeks- shows low charge or need service when checked. The old battery had the same problem and left me several times stranded with no starting power. the day I changed batteries it started almost as soon as the key was turned, now it takes a couple of turns and when I took it to Jiffy Lube for service the battery was low.
there is no charge fault light that comes on the instrument panel, however I do understand that something is not quite right. Can use some guidance in troubleshooting and avoid doing a dozen expensive things by trial and error.
Response:
1) Ring out the voltage at the battery when the engine is idling. Should be between 14.2-14.4 volts. If low, check the belt(s) or alternator.
2) Also, if a serpentine belt, check the idler to see if the shaft is not bent, and the pulley runs freely.
3) you can take the alternator in to auto zone and get it tested free. Its usually the alternator when a car doesn't charge enough.
4) Yes 9 out of ten times is the alternator that has a bad diode and all of your energy leaks out, you can test by placing a screw driver on the back of the alternator while the car is not running and no key on the ignition if the screw diver is attracted to the alternator due to magnetism then you know to replace the alternator.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Monday, June 28, 2010
96 ford explorer no electrical power
went to start vehicle, starter clicked like battery was low, put charger on battery, now there is no power at all to vehicle no instruments brake lights or anything, slowly over the day the power prob got worse as I tried to start the vehicle. no power windows locks or anything. over the course of the day the battery seemed to get worse , battery charger reads battery is charged, my friend thinks a relay, could this be and if so which one?
http://freeautomechanic.com/mechanic/forum/2010/06/96-ford-explorer
http://freeautomechanic.com/mechanic/forum/2010/06/96-ford-explorer
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Diagnosing an Air Conditioning Leak in your car's AC System
Air Conditioning Leak
If your Air Conditioning System seems to loose its cool, no pun intended, it is most likely do to a lose of freon. Freon itself is colorless and can be difficult to locate. Most shop mechanics will add approved fluorescent dye to the Air Conditioning system in order to help locate the leak. Once the dye has been added to the AC system and freon level topped off. Run the engine for 10 - 15 minutes with the AC on Max. Look for signs of the dye around all AC system components. Once you see where the dye has leaked out it is just a matter of swapping out a bad o-ring or replacing the compressor (shown above). The Dye can be easier to see under UV light but is not necessary in all cases.
More Air Conditioning Troubleshooting Tips
Labels:
Air Conditioning,
Auto Repair,
Questions and Answers
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Save A Few $$$ By Doing Your Own Car Repairs! Online Auto Repair Manuals
* Single vehicle subscriptions start at $10.49 and include:
- Diagnostic & Repair Procedures
- Wiring Diagrams
- Electrical Component Locations
- Factory Service Tips, OBD II Codes
- Troubleshooting, Reset Check Engine Light
- Scheduled Maintenance Tables
- Exploded View Illustrations
- Technical Services Bulletins Recalls
Labels:
Auto Repair Manuals
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Beijing's real goal in promoting electric vehicles
This may sound odd, but Beijing's newly announced pilot program to subsidize the sale of plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles in five cities has little to do with the country's serious air pollution.
The central government's real goal is to help key domestic automakers leapfrog their foreign competitors in the race to develop advanced powertrains.
If you doubt this, you might ask why Beijing – one of the world's most polluted cities – is not on the list of five cities that will subsidize the sale of EVs and plug-ins.
That list, by the way, is a handy guide to Beijing's list of winners and losers – that is, the domestic automakers that the government is prepared to support.
Before we name those winners and losers, here's a summary of the pilot program. Purchasers of plug-in hybrids will receive up to 50,000 yuan ($7,321), while buyers of pure electric vehicles will receive up to 60,000 yuan ($8,785).
The five participating cities are required to set up battery recharging stations and recycle used-up batteries.
Those cities also are likely to offer additional subsidies. Shenzhen, for example, already has announced that it will offer an additional 20,000 yuan ($2,928) to each purchaser of an electric vehicle or plug-in.
Add it all up, and you can see that selected domestic automakers will enjoy big competitive advantages over their rivals. And who are those winners? Let's start with that list of cities.
Winners and losers
Participants in the pilot program are the cities of Shanghai, Changchun, Shenzhen, Hangzhou and Hefei. Those locales happen to be the corporate homes of six domestic automakers.
Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp. is based in Shanghai; FAW Group is in Changchun; BYD Auto Co. is in Shenzhen; Chery Automobile Co. is in Wuhu, near Hefei; and both Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Zoyte Holding Group are in Hangzhou.
Each of these automakers has displayed plug-in vehicles and electric cars at China's auto shows, and each has obtained licenses from the central government to build them.
Moreover, these automakers enjoy close ties to their local city governments. For example, BYD recently announced plans to deliver hundreds of e6 electric cars to Shenzhen's taxi fleets. Over the next few years, we can expect similar fleet sales in other cities.
Who are the losers? Two major automakers were left off the list: Changan Automobile Group, based in Chongqing; and Beijing Automotive Industry Holding Co.
Changan has invested in all kinds of technologies, including conventional hybrids, plug-ins, EVs and fuel cells. But Changan hasn't made as much progress in plug-ins and EVs as the six automakers included in the pilot subsidy program.
Likewise, Beijing Auto displayed electric vehicles at the Beijing auto show in April, but it hasn't made much progress either.
No more infighting
There is another aspect to this pilot program worth noting: The domestic automakers now know which technologies to invest in, and that may be worth as much as the actual subsidies.
Previously, it wasn't clear whether the central government favored research on fuel cells, plug-ins or "pure" electrics. Now Beijing's mandate is clear: fuel cells are on the back burner.
That's a setback of sorts for SAIC, which had invested in fuel cells along with hybrids and EVs.
Last week's announcement was jointly released by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Finance, and the National Development and Reform Commission, which is China's highest economic planning agency.
This indicates that government bureaucrats have reached a consensus, said Duan Chenwu, auto technology analyst with IHS Global Insight in Shanghai.
"The most significant thing about the pilot subsidy program is that the government has made it clear which direction domestic automakers should follow," he said. "At this stage, that means more for the domestics than the subsidies."
The central government's real goal is to help key domestic automakers leapfrog their foreign competitors in the race to develop advanced powertrains.
If you doubt this, you might ask why Beijing – one of the world's most polluted cities – is not on the list of five cities that will subsidize the sale of EVs and plug-ins.
That list, by the way, is a handy guide to Beijing's list of winners and losers – that is, the domestic automakers that the government is prepared to support.
Before we name those winners and losers, here's a summary of the pilot program. Purchasers of plug-in hybrids will receive up to 50,000 yuan ($7,321), while buyers of pure electric vehicles will receive up to 60,000 yuan ($8,785).
The five participating cities are required to set up battery recharging stations and recycle used-up batteries.
Those cities also are likely to offer additional subsidies. Shenzhen, for example, already has announced that it will offer an additional 20,000 yuan ($2,928) to each purchaser of an electric vehicle or plug-in.
Add it all up, and you can see that selected domestic automakers will enjoy big competitive advantages over their rivals. And who are those winners? Let's start with that list of cities.
Winners and losers
Participants in the pilot program are the cities of Shanghai, Changchun, Shenzhen, Hangzhou and Hefei. Those locales happen to be the corporate homes of six domestic automakers.
Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp. is based in Shanghai; FAW Group is in Changchun; BYD Auto Co. is in Shenzhen; Chery Automobile Co. is in Wuhu, near Hefei; and both Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Zoyte Holding Group are in Hangzhou.
Each of these automakers has displayed plug-in vehicles and electric cars at China's auto shows, and each has obtained licenses from the central government to build them.
Moreover, these automakers enjoy close ties to their local city governments. For example, BYD recently announced plans to deliver hundreds of e6 electric cars to Shenzhen's taxi fleets. Over the next few years, we can expect similar fleet sales in other cities.
Who are the losers? Two major automakers were left off the list: Changan Automobile Group, based in Chongqing; and Beijing Automotive Industry Holding Co.
Changan has invested in all kinds of technologies, including conventional hybrids, plug-ins, EVs and fuel cells. But Changan hasn't made as much progress in plug-ins and EVs as the six automakers included in the pilot subsidy program.
Likewise, Beijing Auto displayed electric vehicles at the Beijing auto show in April, but it hasn't made much progress either.
No more infighting
There is another aspect to this pilot program worth noting: The domestic automakers now know which technologies to invest in, and that may be worth as much as the actual subsidies.
Previously, it wasn't clear whether the central government favored research on fuel cells, plug-ins or "pure" electrics. Now Beijing's mandate is clear: fuel cells are on the back burner.
That's a setback of sorts for SAIC, which had invested in fuel cells along with hybrids and EVs.
Last week's announcement was jointly released by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Finance, and the National Development and Reform Commission, which is China's highest economic planning agency.
This indicates that government bureaucrats have reached a consensus, said Duan Chenwu, auto technology analyst with IHS Global Insight in Shanghai.
"The most significant thing about the pilot subsidy program is that the government has made it clear which direction domestic automakers should follow," he said. "At this stage, that means more for the domestics than the subsidies."
Monday, June 14, 2010
Friday, June 11, 2010
2001 Audi A4 trouble starting
I have an Audi A4 2001. sometimes when I start it, after moving it, just cant start even though the radio lights came on. But after say one hour, when I try to Start the engine, it comes on.What could be the problem? And the brakes are hard to press.
Response:
Thus could be caused by a bad starter assembly. Best way to test this is to check for voltage at the starter when it will not start…. if it is getting voltage and not turning over, you guess it = replace the starter.
Brake pedal feel is firm, but brakes lack sufficient stopping power or fade
1.Check the operation of the brake booster and brake booster check valve. Replace worn or failed parts.
2.Check brake linings and brake surface areas for glazing and replace worn or damaged parts.
3.Check for seized hydraulic parts and linkages, and clean or replace as needed.
http://www.freeautomechanic.com/brakes.html
Response:
Thus could be caused by a bad starter assembly. Best way to test this is to check for voltage at the starter when it will not start…. if it is getting voltage and not turning over, you guess it = replace the starter.
Brake pedal feel is firm, but brakes lack sufficient stopping power or fade
1.Check the operation of the brake booster and brake booster check valve. Replace worn or failed parts.
2.Check brake linings and brake surface areas for glazing and replace worn or damaged parts.
3.Check for seized hydraulic parts and linkages, and clean or replace as needed.
http://www.freeautomechanic.com/brakes.html
Labels:
Audi,
Auto Repair,
Brakes,
No Start,
Questions and Answers
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
GM to recall 1.5 million vehicles for fire risk
General Motors Co. said it is recalling 1.5 million vehicles with heated washer-fluid systems following engine fires that occurred even after a 2008 fix on many of the same cars for similar problems.
The recalls, to begin by June 14, will affect 18 models of 2006-2009 Buicks, Cadillacs, Chevrolets, GMCs, Hummers and Saturns, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on its Web site today.
In August 2008, GM recalled about 858,000 cars and trucks following reports of fires resulting from shorts in the system that heats windshield-washer fluid. Dealers installed a wire harness that contained a fuse.
However, the module's internal thermal-protection device, or solder cup, “did not function as designed,” GM said in a June 4 letter to NHTSA that was posted today.
No injuries
GM said it has learned of five fires, including several that occurred while the vehicle was unattended. The company is not aware of any injuries or crashes.
“While our analysis shows the number of incidents is very small compared with the number of vehicles on the road, we want our customers to have complete peace of mind,” said Jeff Boyer, GM's executive director of safety.
The models of cars, trucks and crossovers included in the recall are the 2006-09 Buick Lucerne, Cadillac DTS and Hummer H2; the 2008-09 Buick Enclave and Cadillac CTS; and the 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
Also included are the 2007-09 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV and EXT; Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado, Suburban, and Tahoe; GMC Acadia, Sierra, Yukon and Yukon XL; and Saturn Outlook.
While 1.4 million of the vehicles to be recalled are in the United States, there are others in Canada, Mexico and other countries, GM said in a statement.
Once the heated-washer fluid system is removed, the vehicles will no longer have the winter convenience of warm fluid to clean the frozen windshield, GM spokesman Greg Martin said.
GM said it plans to pay $100 to vehicle owners as compensation for permanently disabling and removing the heated washer fluid system. If all 1.5 million vehicles recalled are brought in, GM would pay out roughly $150 million, plus the cost of the actual fixes. GM, in court documents, projected the cost of the first recall was between $20 million and $25 million.
The heat is off
The original units, called HotShot, were manufactured by a suburban Detroit supplier called Microheat Inc.
Microheat's technology gained praise. In 2006, the company was a finalist for an Automotive News PACE Award given annually for supplier product and process innovation. PACE stands for Premier Automotive Suppliers' Contribution to Excellence.
But after GM's problems with HotShot began to emerge in 2008, Microheat ceased production of the units and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Microheat's Web site is no longer active.
The recalls, to begin by June 14, will affect 18 models of 2006-2009 Buicks, Cadillacs, Chevrolets, GMCs, Hummers and Saturns, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on its Web site today.
In August 2008, GM recalled about 858,000 cars and trucks following reports of fires resulting from shorts in the system that heats windshield-washer fluid. Dealers installed a wire harness that contained a fuse.
However, the module's internal thermal-protection device, or solder cup, “did not function as designed,” GM said in a June 4 letter to NHTSA that was posted today.
No injuries
GM said it has learned of five fires, including several that occurred while the vehicle was unattended. The company is not aware of any injuries or crashes.
“While our analysis shows the number of incidents is very small compared with the number of vehicles on the road, we want our customers to have complete peace of mind,” said Jeff Boyer, GM's executive director of safety.
The models of cars, trucks and crossovers included in the recall are the 2006-09 Buick Lucerne, Cadillac DTS and Hummer H2; the 2008-09 Buick Enclave and Cadillac CTS; and the 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
Also included are the 2007-09 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV and EXT; Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado, Suburban, and Tahoe; GMC Acadia, Sierra, Yukon and Yukon XL; and Saturn Outlook.
While 1.4 million of the vehicles to be recalled are in the United States, there are others in Canada, Mexico and other countries, GM said in a statement.
Once the heated-washer fluid system is removed, the vehicles will no longer have the winter convenience of warm fluid to clean the frozen windshield, GM spokesman Greg Martin said.
GM said it plans to pay $100 to vehicle owners as compensation for permanently disabling and removing the heated washer fluid system. If all 1.5 million vehicles recalled are brought in, GM would pay out roughly $150 million, plus the cost of the actual fixes. GM, in court documents, projected the cost of the first recall was between $20 million and $25 million.
The heat is off
The original units, called HotShot, were manufactured by a suburban Detroit supplier called Microheat Inc.
Microheat's technology gained praise. In 2006, the company was a finalist for an Automotive News PACE Award given annually for supplier product and process innovation. PACE stands for Premier Automotive Suppliers' Contribution to Excellence.
But after GM's problems with HotShot began to emerge in 2008, Microheat ceased production of the units and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Microheat's Web site is no longer active.
Labels:
Chevy,
GM,
Questions to ask when buying a car,
Recall Notices
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
1997 Honda Accord Error Codes
1997 Honda Accord 4-cyl VTEC engine light is on. Autozone diagnostic tester displayed these possible errors/causes:
P0401 - EGR insufficient flow, possible EGR Valve, blocked EGR passages in engine;
P0171 - (1) Fuel system too lean bank 1 (Cly #1), large vacuum leak [I found a disconnected hose between valve cover (Cyl#1) and air intake], (2) Fuel system concern, (3) Ignition system concern, (4) MAF sensor faulty, (5) HO2S/AF ratio sensor fault.
P0453 - (1) Sensor circuit high voltage, (2) Open or short circuit condtion, (3) Poor electrical condition, (4) Faulty FTP sensor.
I don’t know where these sensors are located and whether I should change them out if other possible causes might produce the same errors. I found a hose disconnected between the valve cover at #1 Cyl and the air intake.
Can someone shed some light on what might be wrong and how I should proceed?
I looked for vacuum leaks and found a hose disconnected at the #1 Cyl valve cover. The other end was connected to the air intake cover. If I knew where the sensors in question are, I might be able to check the wiring and do some continuity and voltage checks.
P0401 - EGR insufficient flow, possible EGR Valve, blocked EGR passages in engine;
P0171 - (1) Fuel system too lean bank 1 (Cly #1), large vacuum leak [I found a disconnected hose between valve cover (Cyl#1) and air intake], (2) Fuel system concern, (3) Ignition system concern, (4) MAF sensor faulty, (5) HO2S/AF ratio sensor fault.
P0453 - (1) Sensor circuit high voltage, (2) Open or short circuit condtion, (3) Poor electrical condition, (4) Faulty FTP sensor.
I don’t know where these sensors are located and whether I should change them out if other possible causes might produce the same errors. I found a hose disconnected between the valve cover at #1 Cyl and the air intake.
Can someone shed some light on what might be wrong and how I should proceed?
I looked for vacuum leaks and found a hose disconnected at the #1 Cyl valve cover. The other end was connected to the air intake cover. If I knew where the sensors in question are, I might be able to check the wiring and do some continuity and voltage checks.
Labels:
Engine Trouble Codes,
Honda,
Questions and Answers
Monday, June 7, 2010
Saturday, June 5, 2010
MITCHELL1 is now online for the Do-it-Yourself er
ONLINE AUTO REPAIR MANUALS - Just $9.99
More Coverage Than Anybody Else
•Accessories
•Airbags
•Air Conditioning & Heating
•Brakes
•Clutches
•Diagnostics
•Drive Axles
•Electrical
•Emission Controls
•Engine Cooling
•Engine Performance
•Maintenance
•Recalls
•Steering
•Suspension
•Technical Service Bulletins
•Transmission Servicing & Electronic Diagnosis
•Wheel Alignment
•Wiring Diagrams
More Coverage Than Anybody Else
•Accessories
•Airbags
•Air Conditioning & Heating
•Brakes
•Clutches
•Diagnostics
•Drive Axles
•Electrical
•Emission Controls
•Engine Cooling
•Engine Performance
•Maintenance
•Recalls
•Steering
•Suspension
•Technical Service Bulletins
•Transmission Servicing & Electronic Diagnosis
•Wheel Alignment
•Wiring Diagrams
Labels:
Auto Repair Manuals
Friday, June 4, 2010
Jeep Liberty rear end trouble
Have you heard of blowing your rear end due to driving with a different tire. I had put my spare tire on 3 days earlier due to a flat that could not be repaired, the spare was an all season, other 3 are mud and snow. The wheel base was the same, just 1.5 inches difference to wear and tare on tires and different type. (I was waiting for a replacement tire that was on order.) The mechanic at chrysler is telling me this is the reason the back end went. (Too top it off, my mileage is at 102,000 and the warranty was to 100,000.)
Now that i have my new tire, the mechanic says it is still 1/2 larger and the other tires should be replaced . Is it possible to blow the rear end again?…or is the mechanic covering his warranty by telling me this is the cause of the rear diff major damage…r/r complete assembly Replaced.
Now that i have my new tire, the mechanic says it is still 1/2 larger and the other tires should be replaced . Is it possible to blow the rear end again?…or is the mechanic covering his warranty by telling me this is the cause of the rear diff major damage…r/r complete assembly Replaced.
Labels:
differential
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Mercury production to end in Q4
Ford Motor Co. will discontinue its 71-year-old Mercury brand and end vehicle production in the fourth quarter, Mark Fields, Ford's president of the Americas, said today.
Fields also announced plans to expand the Lincoln lineup with seven new or refreshed vehicles in the next four years.
Ford product development chief Derrick Kuzak said a new compact car will be developed for Lincoln. The car will be based on the same platform that the 2011 Ford Focus sits on, but it will be designed and engineered specifically for Lincoln, he said.
The final decision to kill Mercury was made this week and approved by Ford's board today, Fields said.
A total of 1,712 dealerships sell the Mercury brand in the United States, but there are no stand-alone Mercury stores. Among the Mercury stores, 511 also have Ford franchises, 276 are combined with Lincoln franchises, and 925 are dualed with both Ford and Lincoln franchises.
Some of the 276 Lincoln-Mercury dealerships are in markets that cannot support a stand-alone Lincoln store, Fields said. He said Ford Motor will work with those stores, helping them to either get a Ford franchise or consolidate their Lincoln franchise with a Ford store.
“We do foresee in some markets there could be some stand-alone Lincoln dealerships,” Fields said.
More information to come
Mercury dealers will all receive packets tomorrow morning outlining Ford's transition plan for the brand and outlining monetary compensation for their stores based on a formula Ford has developed, Fields said.
Fields said Ford decided to close Mercury during its annual spring business and product review. Ford division's improved market share -- up 2.2 percentage points through April compared with last year -- combined with the fact that most Mercury customers cross-shop the Ford brand, made it sensible to cut Mercury, Fields said.
“And it allows us to put 100 percent of our resources into Ford and Lincoln,” he said.
Dealer Bob Tasca Jr., who heads the Lincoln Mercury brands of the dealer council, calls this an emotional decision because it will affect dealers' lives.
“Some of the dealers have their homes mortgaged to their business,” said Tasca, who has two Ford-Lincoln/Mercury stores, one in Rhode Island and one in Massachusetts. “Some are going to make it, and some won't. But I really expect Ford will be fair.”
Ed Tonkin, chairman of the National Automobile Dealers Association, called it “a sad day.”
“NADA's concern is that Ford treats each of its Mercury dealers fairly and equitably,” he said, “especially the 276 of whom sell Lincoln and Mercury exclusively.
“Ford also needs to move quickly to take into account the millions of dollars that dealers have invested in facilities, equipment, personnel and training. They deserve fair compensation.”
Fields said Ford will offer special incentives to move Mercury vehicles this summer. He said he expects most of the Mercury inventory to be sold off by the end of this year.
There will be no job cuts that result from the demise of Mercury. Ford will redeploy any Mercury personnel to the Lincoln brand.
Besides an expanded lineup, Lincoln also gets an expanded marketing team, Fields said.
Ford declined to reveal how much it will cost the company to discontinue Mercury but said Ford's recent profitability has made it possible to make the move now. Ford reported a second quarter net profit of $2.1 billion.
Good thing in the long run
Peter Gervais, general manager of Gervais Lincoln-Mercury in Lowell, Mass., said in the long run the move “will probably be a good thing.”
"Lincoln has a little more brand status than Mercury," he added. “I think it was overdue and it should have happened beforehand.”
Ed Witt of Witt Lincoln-Mercury in San Diego, Calif., said he was optimistic about the switch.
“We love our Mercury brand. On the other hand, we are excited to take on a brand like Lincoln and making it a luxury brand. They're going to take the Lincoln brand to where it's never been before.”
He said he though Ford's leadership would take care of the Mercury dealers.
“Look at what they've been doing,” he said. “They've done it through leadership and focus and that's what we're going to do with Lincoln. This Mercury question has been around forever, a thorn in my saddle.
“We have definition, we have structure, and we have focus and direction. What else could I want? I think it's a big opportunity.”
Dealers reached by Automotive News said they weren't surprised.
“All I can say is this: I hate it,” said Robert Hammett, general manager of Hammett Motor Co. in Durant, Miss. “But they really don't need to make two of the same vehicles and put two different names on them. Mercury should have been a totally different outfit. Everybody has been expecting it.”
Glenn Mahoney, sales manager at Dana Ford Lincoln Mercury in Staten Island, N.Y., said some customers have been concerned.
“The dealers will still be here to warrant the cars, we're a dual point,” he said. “I think it is going be great, if we actually expand the Lincoln brand. It's kind of an overkill (with Lincoln and Mercury). The product lines are practically on top of each other.
“So, from that standpoint it was an interchangeable part. From being a dual store, it was nice to have both sides for us. It was kind of nice to have that area to move. I think Mercury sales will do pretty well throughout the end of the year.”
Fields also announced plans to expand the Lincoln lineup with seven new or refreshed vehicles in the next four years.
Ford product development chief Derrick Kuzak said a new compact car will be developed for Lincoln. The car will be based on the same platform that the 2011 Ford Focus sits on, but it will be designed and engineered specifically for Lincoln, he said.
The final decision to kill Mercury was made this week and approved by Ford's board today, Fields said.
A total of 1,712 dealerships sell the Mercury brand in the United States, but there are no stand-alone Mercury stores. Among the Mercury stores, 511 also have Ford franchises, 276 are combined with Lincoln franchises, and 925 are dualed with both Ford and Lincoln franchises.
Some of the 276 Lincoln-Mercury dealerships are in markets that cannot support a stand-alone Lincoln store, Fields said. He said Ford Motor will work with those stores, helping them to either get a Ford franchise or consolidate their Lincoln franchise with a Ford store.
“We do foresee in some markets there could be some stand-alone Lincoln dealerships,” Fields said.
More information to come
Mercury dealers will all receive packets tomorrow morning outlining Ford's transition plan for the brand and outlining monetary compensation for their stores based on a formula Ford has developed, Fields said.
Fields said Ford decided to close Mercury during its annual spring business and product review. Ford division's improved market share -- up 2.2 percentage points through April compared with last year -- combined with the fact that most Mercury customers cross-shop the Ford brand, made it sensible to cut Mercury, Fields said.
“And it allows us to put 100 percent of our resources into Ford and Lincoln,” he said.
Dealer Bob Tasca Jr., who heads the Lincoln Mercury brands of the dealer council, calls this an emotional decision because it will affect dealers' lives.
“Some of the dealers have their homes mortgaged to their business,” said Tasca, who has two Ford-Lincoln/Mercury stores, one in Rhode Island and one in Massachusetts. “Some are going to make it, and some won't. But I really expect Ford will be fair.”
Ed Tonkin, chairman of the National Automobile Dealers Association, called it “a sad day.”
“NADA's concern is that Ford treats each of its Mercury dealers fairly and equitably,” he said, “especially the 276 of whom sell Lincoln and Mercury exclusively.
“Ford also needs to move quickly to take into account the millions of dollars that dealers have invested in facilities, equipment, personnel and training. They deserve fair compensation.”
Fields said Ford will offer special incentives to move Mercury vehicles this summer. He said he expects most of the Mercury inventory to be sold off by the end of this year.
There will be no job cuts that result from the demise of Mercury. Ford will redeploy any Mercury personnel to the Lincoln brand.
Besides an expanded lineup, Lincoln also gets an expanded marketing team, Fields said.
Ford declined to reveal how much it will cost the company to discontinue Mercury but said Ford's recent profitability has made it possible to make the move now. Ford reported a second quarter net profit of $2.1 billion.
Good thing in the long run
Peter Gervais, general manager of Gervais Lincoln-Mercury in Lowell, Mass., said in the long run the move “will probably be a good thing.”
"Lincoln has a little more brand status than Mercury," he added. “I think it was overdue and it should have happened beforehand.”
Ed Witt of Witt Lincoln-Mercury in San Diego, Calif., said he was optimistic about the switch.
“We love our Mercury brand. On the other hand, we are excited to take on a brand like Lincoln and making it a luxury brand. They're going to take the Lincoln brand to where it's never been before.”
He said he though Ford's leadership would take care of the Mercury dealers.
“Look at what they've been doing,” he said. “They've done it through leadership and focus and that's what we're going to do with Lincoln. This Mercury question has been around forever, a thorn in my saddle.
“We have definition, we have structure, and we have focus and direction. What else could I want? I think it's a big opportunity.”
Dealers reached by Automotive News said they weren't surprised.
“All I can say is this: I hate it,” said Robert Hammett, general manager of Hammett Motor Co. in Durant, Miss. “But they really don't need to make two of the same vehicles and put two different names on them. Mercury should have been a totally different outfit. Everybody has been expecting it.”
Glenn Mahoney, sales manager at Dana Ford Lincoln Mercury in Staten Island, N.Y., said some customers have been concerned.
“The dealers will still be here to warrant the cars, we're a dual point,” he said. “I think it is going be great, if we actually expand the Lincoln brand. It's kind of an overkill (with Lincoln and Mercury). The product lines are practically on top of each other.
“So, from that standpoint it was an interchangeable part. From being a dual store, it was nice to have both sides for us. It was kind of nice to have that area to move. I think Mercury sales will do pretty well throughout the end of the year.”
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Air Conditioning 2002 Dodge Durango nothing coming out of dash vents
Air worked fine when it first got hot out this year. Now it only works in the back and the defrost part of dash. Nothing comes out of other dash vents. Any ideas what problem is?
Response:
1) Got Kids? If so, they more than likely dropped something in 1 of the side vents.
2)in some cases if the system is low on refrigerant, the system will ice up blocking some of the vents. try topping off the system with a little more refrigerant
3) Most likely a failed vent/mode door actuator has failed. The Air Conditioning System itself is fine or it wouldn't blow cold at all. The Blower motor is fine or it wouldn't blow air. So the only thing left is the door is jammed or the electrical actuator that moves the "mode" door from vent/dash/floor.
Response:
1) Got Kids? If so, they more than likely dropped something in 1 of the side vents.
2)in some cases if the system is low on refrigerant, the system will ice up blocking some of the vents. try topping off the system with a little more refrigerant
3) Most likely a failed vent/mode door actuator has failed. The Air Conditioning System itself is fine or it wouldn't blow cold at all. The Blower motor is fine or it wouldn't blow air. So the only thing left is the door is jammed or the electrical actuator that moves the "mode" door from vent/dash/floor.
Labels:
Air Conditioning,
Questions and Answers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)